Call of Duty devs promise game-changing fixes ⇒ CODIntel

Developer response to active camo in Black Ops 7

One of the most talked-about additions to Call Of Duty devs promise Black Ops 7 is the return of the Active Camo Field Upgrade. This ability, which grants temporary invisibility, has existed in previous Call of Duty titles like Black Ops 3. While it doesn’t make players fully invisible, it does heavily reduce visibility and adds a shimmering effect that can make it hard to track targets during chaotic firefights.

Treyarch’s Design Director, Matt Scronce, addressed the concern directly. After the feature appeared in clips posted by CharlieIntel and sparked backlash, Scronce clarified, “We’ve got it in a great spot at the moment where it feels awesome to use and make plays without being overbearing. It also has plenty of counters.” He confirmed that the team is listening and will further tune it during the open beta.

That level of transparency is something the Call of Duty devs promise community has been demanding for years. By acknowledging the conversation so early, Treyarch is showing signs they may be ready to meet those expectations.

Source: WhosImmortal

Will the Black Ops 7 beta lead to real changes?

Historically, many fans have felt that Call of Duty devs promise, betas serve more as marketing tools than true feedback mechanisms. Rah, a community member, asked on X (formerly Twitter) whether player feedback would finally influence the finished game. Matt Scronce’s reply was promising: “We’ve never shipped a beta and not either had considerable balance changes and fixes while the beta was still live or post-beta before launch.”

That statement means beta feedback won’t be ignored this time. In fact, developers are planning adjustments both mid-beta and between the beta and launch. This could mark a turning point for Treyarch’s communication and willingness to evolve with the community.

Why the Pick 10 system isn’t returning

Another point of frustration for long-time fans is the absence of the beloved Pick 10 create-a-class system. Treyarch recently explained that Pick 10 was removed because it was “too complex” and they preferred the simplicity of the Gunsmith loadout system. This rubbed fans the wrong way, as it came across as an insult to Call of Duty devs promise the community’s intelligence.

Former Sledgehammer Creative Director Greg Riceorf, who helped lead Modern warfare 3, responded bluntly with a lowercase “lol” and followed up by sharing his insights. According to him, Call of Duty devs promise Pick 10 isn’t incompatible with modern Call of Duty systems, but it complicates controller mapping and makes blueprint integration difficult. If you remove grenades or melee, certain buttons go unused, which disrupts user experience.

He also added that monetization concerns could be a factor. Pick 10 would require changes to how blueprints work, which might make it harder to sell pre-built loadouts. Despite this, Riceorf suggested that simplifying blueprint design might actually improve gameplay.

Battlefield 6 is putting the pressure on COD

The timing of these discussions isn’t random. Call of Duty devs promise Battlefield 6 has been gaining major attention by doing everything Call of Duty hasn’t. Developers at DICE have hosted open discussions, changed features mid-beta, and shown community respect through transparency. That puts extra pressure on Treyarch to not just release a polished product, but to do it while communicating actively.

With the Call of Duty devs promise Battlefield beta setting a high bar, fans will be watching closely to see if Treyarch lives up to their new promises. So far, Scronce’s comments are a solid start, but it will be the follow-through that determines how Call of Duty devs promise Black Ops 7 is remembered.